Opinion Dynamics and Social Power Evolution
نویسندگان
چکیده
Our recent work [28] proposes the DeGroot-Friedkin dynamical model for the analysis4of social influence networks. This dynamical model describes the evolution of self-appraisals in a5group of individuals forming opinions in a sequence of issues. Under a strong connectivity assumption,6the model predicts the existence and semi-global attractivity of equilibrium configurations for self-7appraisals and social power in the group.8In this paper, we extend the analysis of the DeGroot-Friedkin model to two general scenar-9ios where the interpersonal influence network is not necessarily strongly connected and where the10individuals form opinions with reducible relative interactions. In the first scenario, the relative inter-11action digraph is reducible with globally reachable nodes; in the second scenario, the condensation12of the relative interaction digraph has multiple aperiodic sinks. For both scenarios, we provide the13explicit mathematical formulations of the DeGroot-Friedkin dynamics, characterize their equilibrium14points, and establish their asymptotic attractivity properties. This work completes the study of the15DeGroot-Friedkin model with most general social network settings and predicts that, under all pos-16sible interaction topologies, the emerging social power structures are determined by the individuals’17eigenvector centrality scores.18
منابع مشابه
Opinion Dynamics and the Evolution of Social Power in Influence Networks
This paper studies the evolution of self appraisal, social power and interpersonal influencesfor a group of individuals who discuss and form opinions about a sequence of issues. Our empirical modelcombines the averaging rule by DeGroot to describe opinion formation processes and the reflected appraisalmechanism by Friedkin to describe the dynamics of individuals’ self appraisal and ...
متن کاملA Theory of the Evolution of Social Power: Natural Trajectories of Interpersonal Influence Systems along Issue Sequences
This article reports new advancements in the theory of influence system evolution in small deliberative groups, and a novel set of empirical findings on such evolution. The theory elaborates the specification of the single-issue opinion dynamics of such groups, which has been the focus of theory development in the field of opinion dynamics, to include group dynamics that occur along a sequence ...
متن کاملModulus Consensus Protocol Design of Discrete-Time Opinion Dynamics on Social Networks Problem description: Opinion dynamics, aiming at describing the evolution of opinions among large populations with social
Opinion dynamics, aiming at describing the evolution of opinions among large populations with social influence, have been widely inspected and a host of models have been reported. However, most of them are considered on cooperative networks which is not the common case because there exist not only cooperative but also antagonistic or competitive relations, e.g., competition between commercial, ...
متن کاملEffects of social diversity on the emergence of global consensus in opinion dynamics.
We propose a variant of the voter model by introducing the social diversity in the evolution process. Each individual is assigned a weight that is proportional to the power of its degree, where the power exponent alpha is an adjustable parameter that controls the level of diversity among individuals in the network. At each time step, a pair of connected individuals, say i and j , are randomly s...
متن کاملA Novel Private Attitude and Public Opinion Dynamics Model for Simulating Pluralistic Ignorance and Minority Influence
Pluralistic ignorance, a well-documented socio-psychological conformity phenomenon, involves discrepancies between private attitude and public opinion in certain social contexts. However, continuous opinion dynamics models based on a bounded confidence assumption fail to accurately model pluralistic ignorance because they do not address scenarios in which non-conformists do not need to worry ab...
متن کاملThe Spread of Opinions and Proportional Voting
Election results are determined by numerous social factors that affect the formation of opinion of the voters, including the network of interactions between them and the dynamics of opinion influence. In this work we study the result of proportional elections using an opinion dynamics model similar to simple opinion spreading over a complex network. ErdősRényi, Barabási-Albert, regular lattices...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2017